WARNING: This ePortfolio is currently being used as a template. Published changes or deletions will affect new ePortfolios created from this template.

DRAFT: This module has unpublished changes.

 

 

CUNY Online B.A. in Sociology

Syllabus and Course Schedule

 

Course Name: Sociology of the Body

Course Number: SOC 320

Type of Course:  Elective

Credits: 3 hours undergraduate credit

Prerequisites: Introduction to Sociology

Instructor: Dr. Lacey Sischo

Course ePortfolio Template:

Online Office Hours: By appointment

 

 

“…the body is a sign, a text to be read and interpreted.” –Rebecca Walker

 

Course Description

This course examines the body as a social construction that is situated within a particular social and historical context.  Students will understand how bodies become gendered, raced, classed, and sexualized in ways that create and reinforce social institutions and relations of power.  They will analyze the reciprocal processes of structuration: how the body is shaped by social expectations and symbolic exchange, how meanings are attached to bodies and different body parts, and how these interpretations in turn shape social relations.  Students will critically evaluate the experience of embodiment and the contribution of sociological theories and data to our understanding of the process.  They will write two course papers on the sociology of the body.

 

Course Overview by Instructor

The body is contested terrain in our society today.  In fact, bodies are often used as vehicles of power, repression, and social control.  Opportunities and lived experiences are shaped by our bodies which are, in turn, shaped by social forces.  This course will take a critical look at how bodies are socially constructed in ways that privilege some bodies over others.  Specifically, we will examine how bodies are gendered, raced, classed, and sexualized in ways affect embodied experience and life chances.  We will also examine how meanings are attached to bodies that make some bodies more economically and culturally valuable than others.  Through this class, students will learn how situating bodies into social hierarchies affects the construction of the self and contributes to larger systems of inequality.

 

Course Learning Objectives and Outcomes:

Upon completion of the course, students will:

 

  • Understand sociological theories that explain how bodies become gendered and “racialized” to align with culturally defined standards or expectations.
  • Apply, compare and evaluate body theory(ies) as these are used to identify and analyze a social problem related to the body.
  • Interpret the body and representation of the body as symbols in a contested terrain (i.e., a political battleground or a literal and metaphorical space where social forces, ideologies, and social practices intrude).
  • Integrate and apply theories of the body to develop a research hypothesis and strategy for gathering, interpreting and analyzing data relevant to gendering and/or racializing the body in the workplace
  • Gather, interpret, and assess information related to the body from a variety of sources and points of view.
  • Evaluate evidence and arguments related to theories of the body critically or analytically.
  • Produce well-reasoned written or oral arguments using evidence to support conclusions.

 

Grading Policy: Overview

This is an elective course in sociology.  The expectation is that you will take an active role to communicate and share what you are learning through individual writing and class discussion.  Please note that this course is reading and writing intensive.

 

You should organize your time and plan on spending about 9 hours per week on this course.  Expect to devote more time to the course when you are working on a Reading Summary/Critical Review and/or when a paper is due.  You must log on a minimum of three times per week.  A good strategy is to spend some time reading through the syllabus and organizing your work to maximize efficiency.

 

Weighting of Assignments

 

ASSIGNMENT

DESCRIPTION

TOTAL

Discussion Fora

10 weekly discussions @ up to 5 pts each*

50

Critical Review 

Critical review of one week’s recommended reading

10

Paper 1

Critical analysis of Chris Rock’s documentary “Good Hair”

20

Paper 2

Content analysis: self-presentation of bodies in the workplace

40

Reflections and Comments

After completing each paper, you must comment on the paper of one classmate and then reflect on the assignment and your own work, revising as appropriate.  Final Drafts of both papers should be copied to your eportfolio.  At the end of the semester, you must write a final reflection on the course. 3@5 pts each

15

ePortfolio

The ePortfolio grade will include completing all tasks or assignments on the syllabus, participating in a peer feedback/review, and my evaluation. Please refer to the information below under “Additional Resources” for details and contact information regarding ePortfolio @ SPS

15

Total Possible Points

 

150

*Not all weeks will be graded

 

The above serves as a guide for allocating time and energy.  Final grades include discretionary judgments by the instructor, which may cause shifts in actual grades within a five point range.  Please contact your instructor immediately on any questions about individual grades.

 

Grading Scale

 

A             93+                       C+           78-79                     D-           60-62

A-           90-92                     C             73-77                     F              59 and below

B+           88-89                    C-            70-72

B             83-87                    D+          68-69

B-            80-82                    D             63-67

 

 

Course Materials and Resources

 

There are no books required for this course.  All the readings are posted under the “Content” tab in the course website.

 

Academic Honesty and Plagiarism

 

Everything you submit for this course must be your own work. Copying material exactly or very closely from any source without using quotation marks and citing your source is plagiarism and will result in an automatic zero for that assignment. There are a number of sources about plagiarism in Websites on the course panel. Please check these when you are uncertain. Below is CUNY’s description of prohibited behavior:

 

"Plagiarism is the act of presenting another person’s ideas, research or writings as your own. The following are some examples of plagiarism, but by no means is it an exhaustive list: copying another person’s actual words without the use of quotation marks and citations, presenting another’s ideas or theories in your own words without acknowledging the source, using information that is not common knowledge without acknowledging the source, failing to acknowledge collaborators on homework assignments. Internet plagiarism includes purchasing or downloading term papers online, paraphrasing or copying information from the Internet without citing the source, and “cutting and pasting” from various sources without proper attribution.”

 

Assignments

 

Readings and assignments are organized into weekly modules.  Each week begins and ends on Sunday.  This means that all assignments for a given week must be completed by 11:59 p.m. (EST) on Sunday.  Detailed instructions for assignments will be posted at the beginning of each week in folders that can be accessed through Assignments on the Course Navigation panel.  Each assignment folder is clearly labeled, e.g., “Instructions for Paper 1.”  Assignments will require various types of work/participation as described below.

 

Weekly Participation

 

Discussion Forums:

The Discussion Board is a critical venue for developing intellectual relationships with your instructor and with your classmates. Each week you will be expected to participate in the Discussion Forum and address the topic of the forum. Each week’s discussion board is due at 11:59 p.m. (EST) on Sunday night.  Participation means posting an initial focused response to the topic in at least 200 words and responding to at least two of your classmates (responses must be at least 50 words).  You must complete the required readings prior to posting.  In order to receive credit for participating, you must post your initial response no later than Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. (EST) in order to allow time for real discussion.  Please read the Discussion Forum rubric carefully.  Discussions will be evaluated based on contribution to the discussion topic and engagement with other students.  In other words, discussion posts should add an appropriate, unique contribution that references the reading and should also respond to fellow classmates’ posts.  In order to receive full credit, discussion posts must reference the reading, including the required and recommended reading.  The purpose of the discussion board is to allow students to engage in a scholarly discussion and debate about class topics and assignments.

 

Critical Review:

Each student will be responsible for writing a critical review of one week’s recommended reading.  Students will summarize the main points from the recommended reading (one paragraph or about a ½ page), offer a critique of the article or chapter’s strengths and weaknesses, and relate (i.e., compare and contrast) it to the required readings from that week.  The critical review should be approximately two pages (double-spaced).  Critical reviews should also incorporate relevant additional information or media examples such as You Tube clips, newspaper articles or editorials, advertisements, or song lyrics that pertain to the recommended reading and the week’s topic.  Critical Reviews should be posted at the beginning of the week (by Tuesday night at 11:59 p.m. EST) to the class discussion board.

 

Paper 1:

Critical Analysis of “Good Hair”

Watch the Chris Rock documentary, “Good Hair,” and analyze it using two of the three sociology of the body theories we read in week 1 (Bordo, Schippers, and/or Frost).  Which part(s) of the theories address issues identified in the documentary?  What are some issues that the theories identify relative to African American hair, the construction of femininity, and the commodification of beauty (among others) that the documentary does not address?  In other words, what does Chris Rock miss from the perspective of sociology of the body and body theory?  Papers should be between 2-3 pages (double-spaced).

 

Paper 2:

Content Analysis: Self-Presentation of Bodies in the Workplace (Adapted from Dr. Giovanna Follo)

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to explore, through content analysis, the presentation of bodies in the workplace, as evidenced in popular culture. This critical analysis aims at the student discovering the various messages about femininity, masculinity, the body, and beauty, and how they differ by race/ethnicity, class, and sexuality.  In particular, this analysis will examine how bodies are used, dressed, adorned, maneuvered, positioned, etc. in ways that affect power relationships and dynamics within the workplace. 

 

This assignment will use a “strategic interaction” framework as proposed by Goffman1.  Strategic interaction involves making moves or engaging in behaviors that carry “fateful implications for all parties” (Goffman 1972: 127).  During strategic interaction, individuals carefully consider the consequences of their actions and choose the best strategy in order to obtain a desired outcome.  In the workplace, strategic interaction operates in many different situations and between various actors (e.g., supervisor/employee, employee/customer, employee/employee).  Actors present a particular self through the use of the body (e.g., clothing choice, appearance, demeanor, etc.) in order to achieve a goal or outcome (e.g., a sale, promotion, etc.) through interaction.

 

Students will be required to conduct a content analysis of a film about work (e.g., “Office Space,” “9-5,” “Working Girl,” “North Country,” “Clerks,” “The Devil Wears Prada,” “Glengarry Glen Ross,” “Norma Rae,” etc.). Students will first look at the female body and then the male body and finally compare how the bodies are represented in the workplace, particularly in relation to race/ethnicity.  More details can be found under the “Paper Instructions” tab in the course website.

 

1Goffman, Erving.  1972.  Strategic Interaction.  New York: Ballantine.

 

ePortfolios:

This course requires students to create and use an ePortfolio using the Digication Platform. Students will be using ePortfolios to present their work, communicate with their class and instructor (in addition to BB) and will be creating a personal academic portfolio they will be using throughout their academic career. Training is hands on and will be integrated into the coursework (see schedule). Students are required to read the SPS ePortfolio Student Handbook and keep handy the ePortfolio Resources Website. For additional technical help, please contact the ePortfolio Team at eportfolios@spsmail.cuny.edu. An advisor is available every day and most evenings.

 

Additional Resources:

All resources for this course are available online through Blackboard. Please refer to the Blackboard Announcements section for suggested handbooks, links, and online resources.

 

Accessibility and Accommodations

 

The CUNY School of Professional Studies is firmly committed to making higher education accessible to students with disabilities by removing architectural barriers and providing programs and support services necessary for them to benefit from the instruction and resources of the University. Early planning is essential for many of the resources and accommodations provided. Please see:

http://www.sps.cuny.edu/student_services/disabilityservices.html

 

All documentation should be sent to:

StudentServicesCoordinatorCUNYSchoolof Professional Studies 101 West 31st Street, 7th Floor, Room 720New York, N.Y, 10001

 

Students considering or already registered in the CUNY School of Professional Studies should feel free to contact the Student Services Coordinator, Cristina Finan at cristina.finan@mail.cuny.edu or 212-652-2014 about arrangements and accommodations.  Students may choose to discuss their disabilities with their faculty members to work out ways of meeting the specific requirements of the course. Nevertheless, official documentation is essential for accommodations to be established.

 

Online Etiquette and Anti-Harassment Policy

 

The University strictly prohibits the use of University online resources or facilities, including Blackboard, for the purpose of harassment of any individual or for the posting of any material that is scandalous, libelous, offensive or otherwise against the University’s policies. Please see:

http://www.sps.cuny.edu/student_services/pdf/Netiquette.pdf

 

Academic Integrity

 

TheSchoolofProfessional Studieshas adopted the view that academic integrity is a critical characteristic of all of our academic programs and that maintenance of academic integrity requires the that all members of the SPS community play an active and positive role. Academic dishonesty is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Cheating, forgery, plagiarism and collusion in dishonest acts undermine the educational mission of the City University of New York and the students' personal and intellectual growth. Please see: http://www.sps.cuny.edu/acad_policies/index.html

 

Student Support Services

 

TheSchoolofProfessional Studiesoffers a wide variety of academic support students for students, including online tutorial services in most courses, career guidance, and a robust array of online and in-person library services.  For more information about these services, please visit Student Support Services: http://www.sps.cuny.edu/student_resources/index.html.

 

 Syllabus Changes

 

This syllabus is a guide for the course and is subject to change with advance notice.  In the unlikely event that we need to change the dates listed for activities or assignments as the semester progresses, you will be notified by email and through the course Announcements.  

Course Schedule

WEEK 1 (DATES):

Theorizing Bodies

Required Reading:

  • Bordo, Susan. 1999. “Introduction: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body.” Pp. 1-44 in Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body.New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Schippers, Mimi.  2007.  “Recovering the Feminine Other: Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender Hegemony.”  Theory and Society 36(1): 85-102.

Recommended Reading:

  • Frost, Liz.  2005.  “Theorizing the Young Woman in the Body.”  Body & Society 11(1):63-85.

Assignment:

Discussion forum

WEEK 2 (DATES):

Social Construction of the Body

Required Reading:

  • Lorber, Judith.  1993.  “Believing is Seeing:  Biology as Ideology.”  Gender and Society 7(4): 568-581.
  • Martin, Karin A. 1998. Becoming a Gendered Body: Practices of Preschools.  American Sociological Review 63(4): 494-511.

Recommended Reading:

  • Connell, R.W.  1999.  “Making Gendered People: Bodies, Identities, and Sexualities.”  Pp. 449-471 in Revisioning Gender, Myra Marx Ferree, Judith Lorber, and Beth B. Hess (Eds.).Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.      

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum
  • Set up your ePortfolio (DUE DATE)

WEEK 3 (DATES):

Reproduction

Required Reading:

  • Teman, Elly.  2009.  “Embodying Surrogate Motherhood: Pregnancy as Dyadic Body Project.”  Body & Society 15(3): 47-69.
  • Bordo, Susan.  1993.  “Are Mothers Persons? Reproductive Rights and the Politics of Subjectivity.”  (Pp. 45-70) in Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley:University ofCalifornia Press.

Recommended Reading:

  • Rothman, Barbara Katz.  1999.  “Now You Can Choose! Issues in Parenting and Procreation.”  Pp. 399-415 in Revisioning Gender, Myra Marx Ferree, Judith Lorber, and Beth B. Hess (Eds.).Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum
  • Complete the "About Me" section on your ePortfolio (DUE DATE)

WEEK 4 (DATES):

Gendering Women’s Bodies

Required Reading:

  • Gagne, Patricia and Deanna McGaughey.  2002.  “Designing Women: Cultural Hegemony and the Exercise of Power among Women Who Have Undergone Elective Mammoplasty.”  Gender and Society 16(6): 814-848.
  • Young, Iris Marion.  1980.  “Throwing like a girl: a Phenomenology of the feminine body comportment, motility, and spatiality.” Human Studies 3(2): 137-156.

Recommended Reading

  • Pitts, Victoria L.  1998.  “Reclaiming the Female Body: Embodied Identity Work, Resistance, and the Grotesque.” Body & Society 4(3): 67-84.

Assignment:

Discussion Forum

WEEK 5 (DATES):

Gendering Men’s Bodies

Required Reading:

  • Messner, Michael A.  1992.  “The Embodiment of Masculinity.”  Chapter 4 (pp. 61-84) in Power at Play: Sports and the Problem of Masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Lorber, Judith and Lisa Jean Moore.  2007.  “Adonis, Don Juan, and ‘Real Men’: Constructing Men’s Bodies” Chapter 5 (pp. 113-136) in Gendered Bodies: Feminist Perspectives. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.

Recommended Reading

  • Jefferson, Tony.  1998.  “Muscle, ‘Hard Men,’ and ‘Iron’ Mike Tyson: Reflections on Desire, Anxiety and the Embodiment of Masculinity.”  Body & Society 4(1): 77-98.

Assignment:

Discussion Forum

WEEK 6 (DATES):

Beauty Ideal

Required Reading:

  • Thompson, Becky Wangsgaard.  1992.  “A Way Outa No Way: Eating Problems among African American, Latina, and White Women.”  Gender and Society 6(4): 546-561.
  • Crossley, Nick.  2004.  “Fat is a Sociological Issue: Obesity Rates in Late Modern, ‘Body Conscious’ Societies.”  Social Theory and Health 2: 222-253.

Recommended Reading:

  • Hesse-Biber, Sharlene.  1996.  “Joining the Cult of Thinness” Chapter 6 (pp. 69-79) in Am I Thin Enough Yet? The Cult of Thinness and the Commercialization of Identity. New York:OxfordUniversity Press.

Assignment:

Discussion Forum

WEEK 7 (DATES):

Commodification of Bodies/Bodies in Consumer Culture

Required Reading:

  • Bordo, Susan.  1993.  “Reading the Slender Body.”  (Pp. 185-212) in Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley:University ofCalifornia Press.
  • hooks, bell. 1998. "Selling Hot Pussy: Representations of Black Female Sexuality in the Cultural Marketplace." Pp. 122-132 in The Politics of Women's Bodies: Sexuality, Appearance, and Behavior Rose Weitz (Ed.).New York:OxfordUniversity Press.

Recommended Reading:

  • Orend, Angela and Patricia Gagne.  2009.  “Corporate Logo Tattoos and the Commodification of the Body.”  Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38: 493-517.

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum
  • Short Paper #1 (Due DATE)
  • In course journals, comment on at least one other student’s paper  (DUE DATE)
  • Reflection #1 (DUE DATE)
  • Write a reflection of the assignment based on peer feedback
  • Upload reflection to SafeAssign
  • ePortfolio (DUE DATE)
  • Upload final version of Paper 1 to your ePortfolio
    • Upload draft of Paper 1 to SafeAssign
    • Post copy of paper to your journal

WEEK 8 (DATES):

Controlling/Regulating Bodies

Required Reading:

  • Comfort, Megan L. 2003. “In the Tube at San Quentin: The Secondary Prisonization of Women Visiting Families.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32(1):77-107.
  • Irving K. Zola, “Medicine as an Institution of Social Control,” Sociological Review 20 (1972): 480-504.

Recommended Reading:

  • Camp, Stephanie M. H.  2002.  “The Pleasures of Resistance: Enslaved Women and Body Politics in the PlantationSouth, 1830-1861.”  Southern Historical Association 68(3): 533-572.

Assignment:

Discussion Forum

WEEK 9 (DATES):

Medicalization of the Body

Required Reading:

  • Loe, Meika.  2004.  “The Rise of Erectile Dysfunction.”  Chapter 2 (pp. 29-62) in The Rise of Viagra: How the Little Blue Pill Changed Sex in America. New York:New YorkUniversity Press.
  • Pitts-Taylor, Victoria.  2007.  “The Medicalization of Surgery Addiction.”  Chapter 4 (pp. 100-127) in Surgery Junkies: Wellness and Pathology in Cosmetic Surgery. New Brunswick:RutgersUniversity Press.

Recommended Reading:

  • Kendall, Kathy.  1991.  “The Politics of Premenstrual Syndrome: Implications for Feminist Justice.”  The Journal of Human Justice 2(2): 77-98.

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum
  • Paper 2: Part 1 (DUE DATE)
    • Choose partner and movie for Paper 2 (Content Analysis)
    • Get movie approved by instructor
    • Post choice to course wiki

WEEK 10 (DATES)

Sexuality

Required Reading:

  • Drummond, Murray J. 2005. “Men’s Bodies: Listening to the Voices of Young Gay Men.” Men and Masculinities 7(3):270-290.
  • Creed, Barbara. 1999. "Lesbian Bodies: Tribades, Tomboys, and Tarts." Pp. 111-124 in Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader, Janet Price and Margrit Shildrick (Eds.).New York: Routledge.

Recommended Reading:

  • Espiritu, Yen Le.  2000.  “‘Americans Have a Different Attitude’: Family, Sexuality, and Gender in Filipina American Lives.”  Pp. 222-234 in Gender Through the Prism of Difference, Maxine Baca Zinn, Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo, and Michael A. Messner (Eds.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum
  • Paper 2: Part 2 (DUE DATE)
    • Along with partner, develop research hypothesis
    • Post hypothesis to each partner’s ePortfolio
    • Contribute to the creation of the coding system using the course wiki

WEEK 11 (DATES):

Race/Ethnicity

Required Reading:

  • Beauboeuf-Lafontant, Tamara. 2003. “Strong and Large Black Women?: Exploring Relationships between Deviant Womanhood and Weight.” Gender and Society 17(1): 111-121.
  • Pyke, Karen D. and Denise L. Johnson.  2003.  “Asian American Women and Racialized Femininities: ‘Doing’ Gender Across Cultural Worlds.”  Gender and Society 17(1): 33-53.

Recommended Reading:

  • Morris, Stephen G.  2011.  “Preserving the Concept of Race: A Medical Expedient, a Sociological Necessity.”  Philosophy of Science 78(5): 1260-1271.

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum
  • Paper 2: Part 3 (DUE DATE)
    • Data Coding: Using the coding system created by the class, code your movie and enter the data into the Google Documents coding form

WEEK 12 (DATES):

Disabled Bodies

Required Reading:

  • Gerschick, Thomas J. and Adam Stephen Miller.  2000.  “Coming to Terms: Masculinity and Physical Disability.”  Pp. 109-122 in Gender Through the Prism of Difference, Maxine Baca Zinn, Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo, and Michael A. Messner (Eds.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Ingunn Moser. 2000. “Against Normalisation: Subverting Norms of Ability and Disability.” Science as Culture 9(2): 201-240.

Recommended Reading:

  • Axtell, Sara.  1999.  “Disability and Chronic Illness Identity: Interviews with Lesbians and Bisexual Women and Their Partners.”  International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 4(1): 53-72.

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum
  • Paper 2: Part 4
    • Begin working on data analysis and report writing

WEEK 13 (DATES):

Aging/Dying Bodies

Required Reading:

  • Dinnerstein, Myraand Rose Weitz. 1994. “Jane Fonda, Barbara Bush, and Other Aging Bodies: Femininity and the Limits of Resistance.” Gender Issues 14(2): 3-24.
  • Eric Klinenberg. 2001.  “Bodies that Don’t Matter: Death and Dereliction in Chicago.” Body & Society 7(2-3): 121-136.

Recommended Reading:

  • Hart, Bethne, Peter Sainsbury, and Stephanie Short.  1998.  “Whose Dying? A Sociological Critique of the ‘Good Death.’” Mortality 3(1): 65-77.

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum
  • Paper 2: Part 4, cont.
      • Upload draft of Paper 2 to SafeAssign (DUE DATE)
      • post copy to each student’s journal (DUE DATE)
      • In course journals, comment on at least one other pair’s paper (DUE DATE)
      • Reflection #2 (DUE DATE) 

WEEK 14 (DATES):

Violence Against Bodies

Required Reading:

  • Lichtenstein, Bronwen. 2005. “Domestic Violence, Sexual Ownership, and HIV Risk in Women in the American Deep South.” Social Science and Medicine 60 (4):701-714.
  • Yuval-Davis, Nira.  2002.  “Gendered Militaries, Gendered Wars.”  Pp. 93-115 in Gender & Nation. London: Sage Publications.

Recommended Reading:

  • Richie, Beth E. and Valli Kanuhu.  2000.  “Battered Women of Color in Public Health Care Systems: Racism, Sexism, and Violence.”  Pp. 129-137 in Gender Through the Prism of Difference, Maxine Baca Zinn, Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo, and Michael A. Messner (Eds.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.             

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum
  • Paper 2: Final Draft (DUE DATE)
    • Upload final version of Paper 2 (Content Analysis) to your ePortfolio
    • Reflection #3 (DUE DATE)
    • Write a reflection of the course and post it to your ePortfolio

WEEK 15 (DATES):

Social Class

Required Reading:

  • Kibria, Nazli.  2000.  “Culture, Social Class, and Income Control in the Lives of Women Garment Workers in Bangladesh.” Pp. 331-345 in Gender Through the Prism of Difference, Maxine Baca Zinn, Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo, and Michael A. Messner (Eds.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Higginbotham, Elizabeth and Lynn Weber.  2000.  “Moving Up with Kin and Community: Upward Social Mobility for Black and White Women.”  Pp. 346-354 in Gender Through the Prism of Difference, Maxine Baca Zinn, Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo, and Michael A. Messner (Eds.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Recommended Reading:

  • Kipnis, Laura with Jennifer Reeder. 1997.  “White Trash Girl: The Interview.” Pp. 113-130 in White Trash: Race and Class in America, Matt Wray and Annalee Newitz (Eds.). New York: Routledge.

Assignment:

  • Discussion Forum

Acknowledgements: Susan J. Ferguson, N. L. Klein, Nathaniel C. Pyle, Bronwen Lichtenstein, Laura Mamo, and Barbara Walters

soc of the body syllabus 12-27-12.doc

DRAFT: This module has unpublished changes.